Supply Chain Management ​
Consists of all parties involved, directly or indirectly in fulfilling a customer request
In fact not a chain but a network
Includes:
- retailers
- wholesalers
- manufacturers
- customers
Objectives of Supply Chain Management: ​
- Effectively managing assets and products, inventories, information, and fund flows (in both directions)
- SC(supply chain) costs include information, storage, transportation, components, assembly, etc.
- Maximize overall value created:
- Success should be measured by the total supply chain surplus, not by profits at an individual stage.
Examples of SCM (Supply Chain Management): ​
- Wall Mart: Supply chain win 📈
- Invested heavily in transportation and information sharing
- Cluster of stores around DCs (Distribution Centers) for frequent store replenishment
- Match supply and demand more effectively
- Information sharing and supplier collaboration to improve product availability and bring down costs
- Sales increase between 1980 and 2010: $1 billion => $408 billion (22% growth per year)
- Borders: Supply chain fail 📉
- Superstore for books sales
- was offering greater variety far more titles than local book stores, dominating the market along with Barnes & Noble
- Sales $4 bln. in 2004 dropped to $ 2.8 bln. in 2009 (Amazon: internet sales offer more titles at a lower cost through a few DCs (Distribution Centers)
- Dell: the original dropshipper. 💻
- Earns its success based on its supply chain design
- Between 1993-2006 made a decision to sell directly to customers bypassing distributors and retailers
- Centralization of manufacturing and inventories in a few locations and final assembly is postponed until the customer order arrives
- Large variety of PC configurations with low cost
- By 2006 sales increased to $ 56 bln (still similar).
- Faced a challenge: Market shifted to low level customization.
- Given growing power of hardware customers were satisfied with few models
- Adapts its supply chain by operating two supply chains for two markets
- Make to order for customized and make to stock for low customized
Decision Phases of a Supply Chain: ​
- Supply Chain strategy or design
- how to structure the supply chain over several years.
- Supply Chain tactical planning
- Decisions over a quarter or year.
- Supply Chain operation
- Daily or weekly operational decisions
Examples ​
- Stategic: long-term, expensive, must take into account market uncertainty
- Whether to outsource or perform a supply chain function in-house
- Example: Pepsi purchases two of its largest bottlers to react more quickly
- Locations and capacities of facilities (manufacturing, warehousing)
- Products to be manufactured (where to produce) and stored at various locations (where to store)
- Type of information system to be utilized
- Planning: Must consider in planning decisions demand uncertainty, exchange rates, competition over mid-time horizon
- Locations are fixed, which markets to supply from which locations Example: Arcelor Mittal’s decision regarding production quantities at each location From where to subcontract
- Warehouse locations are fixed, inventory policies
- Timing and size of market promotions
- Operations: less uncertainty, Focus on service (due date) / efficiency (cost)
- Allocate an inventory or release a production order for customer orders
- Set orders for the week
- Generate pick lists at a warehouse,
- Set delivery schedules and all sorts of scheduling
Customer Order Decoupling Point: ​
proactive | reactive |
---|---|
processes start before customer order | processes start after customer order |
forecast driven | order driven |
efficiency | flexibility |
- ETO (engineer-to-order)
- example: ship
- MTO (make-to-order)
- example: furniture
- ATO (assemble-to-order)
- example: car
- MTS (make-to-stock)
- example: refrigerator
- DFS (deliver-from-local-stock)
- example: food
Examples ​
- Delay product differentiation: United Colors of Benetton
postpone dying until the selling season gets closer so forecast uncertainty for individual products reduces.
Garment production:
- Quick response: ZARA
- Zara: design-to-shelf lead time (display new designs every): 3-4 weeks
- By working with local flexible producers
- Divide 3 month sales season in three 1-month periods
- M1: Decide on quantities for first period only, no sales data;
- M2: production decisions based on first week of sales data
- M3: production decisions based on first month of sales data
- Zara responds to trends rather than having to predict them
- Much smaller forecasting error; less discounts
- Issue: costs for manufacturer (smaller batches, costs of lead time reduction), but most revenues for retailer
- But Zara is vertically integrated
Push / Pull System ​
Two approaches to control production/inventory
- push system
- work release is scheduled based on forecasted (or even actual) demand (hence can be planned in advance).
- "Make all we can just in case".
- Large Lots.
- High Inventories.
- pull system
- work release is authorized based on the current inventory / production status (hence real time).
- "Make what's needed when we need it".
- Small Lots.
- Low inventories.
Drivers of Supply Chain Performance ​
- Logistical Drivers:
- Facilities
- Inventory
- Transportation
- Cross-functional drivers:
- Information
- Sourcing
- Pricing
Coordination in the supply chain ​
Inventories: ​
why do you need inventories ? each type of inventory has it's own name.
- Processing products in a supply chain takes time (e.g. production, distribution), and during inventories are kept work-in-process inventory
- Because typically production or supply is in larger quantities than demand cycle inventory
- Because of uncertainties in demand => need for buffer safety inventory
- Because of anticipated peaks in demand or supply seasonal inventory
Trade-offs for inventories: ​
- work-in-process inventory:
- Proportional to flow time:
- Proportional to flow time:
- cycle inventory
- trade off between:
order/setup costs
and(inventory) holding costs
- trade off between:
- safety inventory
- trade off between:
product availability
and(inventory) holding costs
- trade off between:
- seasonal inventory
- trade off between
inventory holding costs
andcosts of flexible demand / supply
(overcapacity, working overtime in production)
- trade off between
Inventory holding cost ​
Inventory holding cost is a cost composed of costs associated with storing inventory.
Inventory holding cost has many components:
- Tangible costs
- tax
- insurance
- material handling: financial sheets
- Intangible costs
- opportunity: losses in productivity
- customer goodwill
- drops in employee morale
- loss of brand value
How inventories are managed ​
Webshop Example ​
A webshop selling sweaters
Suppose: you sell 3 sweaters per week on average and it requires 1 week to receive an order (lead time)
- Order latest when you have 3 items on stock: reorder point
- Add buffer for uncertainty in demand: reorder point = 4, 5, 6?
Account for materials ordered before that have not arrived yet
Basic Inventory management ​
- Observe demand and try to estimate future demand (forecasting)
- Based on expected demand and variability in lead time demand, determine reorder point ROP
- Based on a cost trade-off, find order quantity Q
- Order Q when the effective inventory (
) reaches ROP - on hand: 📦 inventory you have.
- on order: 🚚 inventory that is on it's way.
- backorders: 🔙 orders that are pending for your clients.
- Your supplier follows a similar procedure.
The Bullwhip effect ​
Supply chain coordination is when all stages of the chain take actions that are aligned and increase total supply chain surplus
- Requires a stage sharing information and taking into account the effects of its actions on the other stages
- Lack of coordination results when:
- Objectives of different stages conflict
- Information moving between stages is delayed or distorted
Bullwhip Effect: Increasing swings in inventory in response to shifts in consumer demand, it causes supply chain inefficiencies.
- Fluctuations in orders increase as they move up the supply chain from retailers to wholesalers to manufacturers to suppliers
- Results from: loss of supply chain coordination